Publication: The Witness
Issued:
Date: 2006-11-10
Reporter: S Makhanya
Reporter: D Liebenberg
Reporter: Sapa
Shaik Whisked to Softer Jail |
Publication |
The Witness
|
Date |
2006-11-10 |
Reporter
|
S Makhanya, D Liebenberg, Sapa
|
Web Link
|
www.witness.co.za
|
Moved from overcrowded Westville to new prison with two-man cells
Convicted fraudster Schabir Shaik spent mere hours in the overcrowded
Westville prison yesterday before being moved to a new prison at Empangeni,
where he might have only one cell-mate.
Shaik arrived at the Westville prison minutes after 9 am, seated alone in
the back of a police van.
The van sped through the prison gate before stopping a few metres inside,
from where Shaik waved to the media and warders, before driving to the
cells.
Dressed in a plain white T-shirt, blue jeans and tackies, Shaik earlier
addressed the media outside the Durban High Court where he had gone to have his
fingerprints taken and complete paperwork before his arrival at the
prison.
A morose-looking Shaik commented: “This is a trying time for my family. I
wish my family all of the very best, especially my wife and my son.
“To all the reporters I have given a hard time, I apologise.
“My heart is at peace and I am walking in the path of my Lord.”
His family followed him to the prison in a convoy of black BMWs. Once
there, about 10 minutes after Shaik’s arrival, brothers Mo, Chippy and Yunus,
and wife Zuleika, avoided media attention, getting into one car, which followed
lawyer Reeves Parsee’s car inside the grounds.
Mo refused to talk to journalists, saying he had already issued a
statement.
The statement said: “We will forever believe in Schabir’s innocence and the
fact that his actions … were out of love, loyalty and comradeship.
“The past few years … have been extremely harrowing for him and for all of
us. … Now that Schabir has been incarcerated, we appeal to the media to allow us
to grieve the tragedy that has befallen our family.”
Despite confirmation from several sources that Shaik was indeed transferred
to Empangeni, a Correctional Services spokesman denied it.
A warder at Empangeni told a Witness reporter he saw Shaik at that prison,
and three sources confirmed the move to Sapa, but national Correctional Services
spokesman Luphumpzo Kebeni said: “As far as I know, Shaik was not transferred. I
don’t know where these stories come from.”
The police officer who drove Shaik to Westville prison remarked to the
media as he left the prison again an hour later: “He won’t be here
long”.
And moments after a prison van left Westville prison at noon, warders told
the media: “There he goes!”
Meanwhile, in contrast to the hero’s send-off given to former ANC whip Tony
Yengeni when he reported to prison earlier this year, there was no visible ANC
presence at the prison yesterday.
ANC Youth League spokesman Senzo Mkhize said a lot of party members have
not been escorted to jail and that there was no need to do that with
Shaik.
“Please don’t compare Shaik and Tony Yengeni because Yengeni was a member
of the national executive committee of the party and they are not the same. For
Yengeni, it was politically relevant,” he said. He added that the party is
mainly concerned about its deputy president, Jacob Zuma.
Although prisoners are permitted to apply for transfers under the amended
Correctional Services Act, the reasons for Shaik’s swift transfer from Westville
to Qalakabusha are unknown.
A warder at the Qalakabusha Correctional Centre told The Witness that even
when the prison is overcrowded, the maximum number of people permitted in one
cell is four in contrast to the 40 to 50 people who share cells at
Westville.
In cells at Qalakabusha, “there are two tables and two chairs and a
bathroom that inmates share and other standard facilities”, he said.
Although sentenced to 15 years in jail, Shaik might serve five years or
less. According to Marcus Gumede of the KZN Law Society, prisoners should serve
a third of their sentence in custody as stipulated by the new law. “It depends
on the nature of the crime, though. White-collar crime could mean serving less
than a third *1,” he said.
KZN head of the SA Prisoners’ Organisation for Human Rights, Derrick
Mdluli, said Shaik could be an asset to fellow prisoners.
“He could become a teacher or develop their skills and take his mind off
the fact that he is imprisoned.”
However, Mdluli warned that the organisation will keep a close eye on the
treatment Shaik receives. “It doesn’t matter how much money you are worth,” he
said.
With acknowledgements to S Makhanya, D Liebenberg, Sapa
and The Witness.
*1 Why, when the SCA promounced as follows :
“The seriousness of the offence of corruption cannot be overemphasised. It
offends against the rule of law and the principles of good governance. It lowers
the moral tone of the nation and negatively affects development and the
promotion of human rights,” the court said.
The aggregate effect of corruption on the population in Africa, even South
Africa, is probably greater than the effect of malaria, TB, AIDS, murder, road
accidents, etc.
Indeed, the application of the many tens of billions of Rands per year
otherwise lost through corruption would make a major impact on remedying these
awful national and continental misfortunes.