Motlanthe May Answer to Another Arms Deal Lawsuit |
Publication |
The Star |
Date | 2009-01-10 |
Reporter |
Angela Quintal |
Web Link |
President Kgalema Motlanthe has a week to
reverse a decision not to appoint an arms deal commission of inquiry or face a
lawsuit for allegedly violating the
constitution.
Motlanthe last month rejected calls by leading South Africans, including Nobel
laureates Desmond Tutu and FW de Klerk, as well as the late Helen Suzman, to
appoint a commission of inquiry in the arms deal.
A 10-page letter of demand was served on the president at his Tuynhuys office in
Cape Town this week and he has until Friday to change his mind.
If he refuses, he is accused of an "awkward
conflict of interest" and having placed the ANC's
interests above the nation's.
While Tutu is on record as saying he was "deeply disappointed" by Motlanthe's
inaction, neither he nor De Klerk are potential litigants.
Anti-arms deal campaigner and author Terry Crawford-Browne, who, along with Cape
Town advocate Paul Hoffman, spearheaded the renewed campaign for an arms deal
inquiry, have taken up the legal cudgels instead. "He [Tutu] is not involved and
neither is Mr De Klerk. They would not be appropriate litigants,"
Crawford-Browne said.
The retired banker has failed in previous arms deal-related court battles
against Finance Minister Trevor Manuel.
The latest legal action would be unprecedented if it gets to the courts, with
experts divided over whether a head of state could be forced to appoint a
judicial commission of inquiry, given the president's constitutional prerogative
to decide.
However, Crawford-Browne argues that Motlanthe did not conduct himself in a
manner "that the law requires, reasonably and accountably, or even rationally".
"The … president has placed himself in a most awkward constitutional position
wherein he is seen as a placing the interests of the ANC before those of the
country.
"It is the president's constitutional responsibility to appoint commissions of
inquiry. This responsibility has to be
discharged legally and rationally with due regard to the
foundational values of our constitutional democracy."
These included the principles of accountability, openness, transparency and
responsiveness to the people's needs.
This required that the president should deal properly and proactively with the
allegations of corruption and impropriety, Crawford-Browne said.
The letter of demand refers among other things to former ANC MP Andrew
Feinstein's allegation - made under oath - that the ANC was funded by the
proceeds of arms deal corruption.
It also refers to ANC president Jacob Zuma - who is likely to succeed Motlanthe.
It states that "perhaps most menacingly of all", Zuma had "let it be known that
if he is convicted on the corruption charges he possibly faces, others will be
exposed by him".
It repeats allegations that British Aerospace paid bribes of about R1.7-billion
to secure its contracts with South Africa and that a British government minister
admitted during 2003 that such "commissions" were paid, but "within reasonable
limits".
The letter rejects many of Motlanthe's reasons for not establishing a commission
- contained in his brief written reply to Tutu and De Klerk last month.
The letter states that laying criminal complaints was an inadequate panacea. The
Scorpions unit, for example, was being disbanded, with no adequate substitute in
place, while there was no chief of police or national director of public
prosecutions, it states. Deputy Justice Minister Johnny de Lange has
acknowledged in parliament that the criminal justice system was dysfunctional.
This all pointed to a commission of inquiry being the only viable and
sustainable option available for draining "the poisoned well" of the country's
body politic, the letter states.
Moreover, those who in the past had
placed information of criminal wrongdoing before the authorities had received no
response beyond an acknowledgment of receipt of their requests and charges. *1
Significantly, the president had also failed to deal with
the civil-law ramifications. This was a "startling omission" indicative of "a
cavalier and ill-considered approach, or worse, a complete failure to apply your
mind to what is a perfectly reasonable request", the letter adds.
Presidential spokesperson Thabo Masebe was not immediately available for
comment.
With acknowledgements to
Angela Quintal
and The Star.