Why Did Zuma Want Niehaus? |
Publication | Mail and Guardian |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Reporter |
Stefaans Brümmer, Pearlie Joubert, Sam Sole, Nic Dawes |
Web Link |
This week’s drama around disgraced ANC spin doctor Carl Niehaus has exposed
elements of an ambitious plan to boost ANC
president Jacob Zuma within the party and in public.
Niehaus’s ill-fated appointment last November -- in the face of internal
opposition at Luthuli House -- appears to stem from an attempt to create a
“machinery” to serve Zuma in the face of his
arms deal travails.
While the ANC has continued publicly to back Zuma as its presidential candidate,
there have been internal debates about his
fitness as a candidate.
The Mail & Guardian has established that a further prong of the Zuma plan
involved the intended appointment of Timothy Bell, a United Kingdom peer
regarded as one of the fathers of modern
spin. Bell helped put Margaret Thatcher in power and keep
her there and more recently helped sweep
Britain’s most protracted arms scandal under the carpet.
Bell appears not to have signed on yet, and reports whether negotiations
continue are contradictory.
Key architects of the plan to boost Zuma include Lindiwe Sisulu, a member of the
national executive committee (NEC) subcommittee set up to support him with his
legal troubles, and Julie Mohammed,
Zuma’s private lawyer and friend.
Following the M&G’s exposé of Niehaus’s trail of debt and fraud last
week, ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe initially said the party would “stand
by him and assist him during this difficult period” -- but that he would be
redeployed from the position of party spokesperson.
But by Tuesday, following a torrent of further revelations, the party decided to
discipline him and he stepped down.
When Niehaus was appointed last November, some of his troubles with debtors --
and potentially with the law -- were well known in the ANC.
But internal opposition appears to have been quelled by the impression that his
appointment had come from on high.
A businessperson privy to discussions told the M&G: “Shortly after [Niehaus]
was appointed, an informal meeting was held where a number of NEC and one or two
national working committee members were present.
“The people at this meeting expressed their profound disappointment with
Niehaus’s appointment ... We all knew what happened at Geda [the Gauteng
Economic Development Agency, where Niehaus admitted to fraud].
“It has always been understood that Niehaus was appointed by Mantashe without
proper consultation and a lot of senior people did not support the appointment
...
“It’s also understood by the ANC leadership that Mantashe appointed Niehaus on
the request of and with the blessing of [Zuma] himself.”
A Luthuli House source said Mohammed,
Zuma’s lawyer, had motivated Niehaus’s appointment.
And a strategist with access to Luthuli House said Zuma’s backers -- Mohammed
key among them -- moved to set up “a strong machinery around the presidency in
Luthuli House”.
This led to unhappiness as it seemed to create a second centre of power -- one
of the problems the new leadership had with former president Thabo Mbeki’s
management style.
Niehaus’s brief at the ANC specifically
included communication on Zuma’s legal troubles. He
travelled to court appearances with Zuma, gave background briefings to foreign
business people and journalists and wrote opinion articles on the matter.
He also liaised with former judge Willem
Heath, who the M&G revealed last year was part of a
“brains trust” set up to support Zuma. Heath remains involved in the effort.
The big gun, however, was to be Bell, who has advised leaders from Thatcher,
Boris Yeltsin and Chile’s Augusto Pinochet to FW de Klerk’s National Party in
the 1994 elections and the post-invasion Iraqi government.
Other Bell clients, whether through his Chime Communications or indirectly
through one of the companies in its subsidiary, the Bell Pottinger group,
include members of the Saudi Arabian government and
British arms giant BAE Systems.
The latter positioned Bell uniquely to
defuse the UK equivalent of South Africa’s arms deal scandal.
He is widely credited with the spin that allowed former prime minister Tony
Blair to force the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) to drop investigations into BAE’s
alleged bribery of Saudi royalty.
Bell reportedly spun the story that the Saudis would drop a new fighter aircraft
order, threatening 100 000 British jobs, while Blair’s government argued the
Saudis would stop cooperating in the war on terror if the investigation went
ahead.
Such arguments may reverberate with Zuma’s backers, more so now that the ANC has
formally joined Zuma’s legal efforts to have the charges against him dropped or
permanently stayed.
Heath argued in Business Day last week that the National Prosecuting
Authority should take the public interest into account, saying: “[A trial after
the elections] would not only destabilise
the ANC, but more pertinently, severely prejudice the
ability of the nation to function, to allow the state to serve the interests of
the populace.”
Another of Bell’s attractions is that while the SFO has dropped the
investigation into the Saudi leg of BAE’s alleged bribery, it
is still probing BAE payments in relation to the South African arms deal.
Being retained by Zuma to help solve his arms deal
troubles -- and sell this to the public -- could open space for a more
comprehensive “solution” to the entire
arms deal scandal.
ANC spokesperson Jesse Duarte confirmed this week that
Bell made a presentation to the ANC in December. A decision was taken not to
retain him: “We said no as the ANC -- we didn’t want that.”
The source with access to Luthuli House said the initiative floundered because
of Bell’s high price tag and his conservative background.
Duarte said she did not know whether there had been any parallel effort, on
behalf of Zuma, but outside of party structures, to retain Bell.
However, a source close to Zuma told the M&G there was a distinction
between Bell’s presentation on election matters and what he called the “Sisulu
initiative” focusing on issues around Zuma’s trial.
Speaking from London, Sisulu confirmed meeting Bell, but denied ongoing contact.
“We did, at some stage, think it necessary to get somebody to speak about the
broader implications of the legal matters concerning JZ.
“We thought it’s necessary to employ somebody because we were not convinced that
his case is sufficiently explained.”
Bell commented: “The fact is we don’t have a contract and we haven’t had a
contract.”
Asked about negotiations towards a contract, he said: “I’m not prepared to
comment on any confidential business discussions I’ve had with anybody.”
A source with indirect access to Bell told the M&G that
Bell expected to start working in South Africa
soon.
What the rest said
The M&G’s exposé of Carl Niehaus last week led to an outpouring of
further revelations in other media organisations. Among the follow-up reports
this week were:
With acknowledgements to Stefaans Brümmer, Pearlie Joubert, Sam Sole, Nic Dawes and Mail and Guardian.