Publication: The Guardian Issued: Date: 2004-12-09 Reporter: David Leigh Reporter: David Pallister Reporter: Rob Evans Reporter: John Aglionby

Guardian Victory in Arms Bribe Case

 

Publication 

The Guardian

Date 2004-12-09
Reporter David Leigh, David Pallister,
Rob Evans, John Aglionby
Web Link www.bday.co.za


The high court yesterday ordered the release of files disclosing payments by a leading British arms company to the daughter of the then president of Indonesia in a landmark ruling for
freedom of information *1.

Mr Justice Park ruled that the Guardian should be allowed access to the court file containing witness statements by the then chief executive of Alvis, a tank manufacturer based in Coventry.

It had been alleged that Alvis paid UKP16,5m in bribes to President Suharto's eldest daughter to secure a UKP160m sale of Scorpion tanks in the mid-1990s which were then used for internal repression.

Alvis attempted to keep the documents secret. But after hearing arguments over three days from Anthony Hudson, counsel for the Guardian, the high court ordered that the newspaper could have copies of the material.

The judge said the Guardian was a serious newspaper, and there was no reason why it could not have access to the court file.

The witness statements formed part of the evidence in an earlier, unreported case in which a former consultant to Alvis, Chan U Seek, claimed UKP6m commission on the tanks sale. "The proceedings between Alvis and Mr Chan were not a private arbitration. They were in open court, and unwelcome publicity for a defendant, including a successful defendant, is not uncommonly a consequence to any case," the judge said.

A large number of internal company memos were disclosed in the Chan hearing, including one from the chief executive referring to the payments to President Suharto's daughter as "a tax". She was referred to in company coded messages as "the lady".

But before the case could be reported, Alvis unexpectedly settled, with a confidentiality agreement that nothing further was to be said about the case. The witness statements handed over yesterday, and published on the Guardian's website today, reveal that Alvis executives tried for years to secure the support of influential people close to the government and the army.

Eventually they were able to hire President Suharto's eldest daughter, known as Tutut, along with another agent, the daughter of an army officer, to get the backing of the army.

The 100 Scorpion light tanks were sold with the promise from the Indonesian regime that they would not be used for internal repression. However, they were subsequently discovered in action in the breakaway province of East Timor and in Aceh. The sales were backed by the British government's Export Credits Guarantee Department, which was left to pick up a UKP93m bill when Indonesia ran into a financial crisis. President Suharto was ousted and Indonesia has asked to postpone payment of its debts.

Susan Hawley, of the anti-corruption campaign the Corner House, said the
Export Credits Guarantee Department "should have spotted that the president's daughter was involved *2. Why didn't alarm bells ring?"

Tapol, the Indonesian human rights campaign, called for a full investigation by both British and Indonesian governments. Its spokesman said: "The allegations further strengthen the case for a freeze on British arms sales to Indonesia. This immoral and corrupt trade will do nothing to promote democracy or development in the country."

Alvis is now owned by BAE Systems. Richard Coltart, BAE spokesman, said: "We have no comment on this matter other than to point out that it relates to an Alvis issue before our ownership of the company."

Former president Suharto's daughter, Tutut, declined to comment on the allegations. An aide told the Guardian on condition of anonymity:
"Of course Ms Tutut was involved in these deals but I'm sure she did nothing illegal."

Alan Rusbridger, the Guardian's editor, said yesterday: "This is an important judgment for the press. The judge has recognised that it's important that newspapers are free to cover court proceedings - and that, in the modern world, it's difficult, if not impossible, to do so without access to the court file.

"Journalists should now find it easier to view court documents, which is only appropriate on the
eve of the introduction of a Freedom of Information Act."


See the evidence

With acknowledgements to David Leigh, David Pallister, Rob Evans, John Aglionby and The Guardian.



*1       Viva Park J,  Viva.


*2      In this country :
  • What about the Minister of Defence's brother-in-law?
  • What about the Chief of Acquisitions's brother?
  • What about the then Deputy President's brother?

Lambert Moloi
Schabir Shaik
Moeletsi Mbeki