Recovering Arms Deal cash futile |
Publication |
Noseweek |
Date | 2012-10-01 |
Reporter | Ron McGregor |
Letters Correspondent
1st November 2012
Corruption soaks up lots of money. So did the
Arms Deal, the World Cup stadiums and a host of
other things – money that could have gone to
upliftment of housing, health and education.
Even with all the wastage, the government still
has billions to spend on housing, health and
education, yet what is achieved? Poorly built
houses, and health and education systems that
are a disgrace. Therefore, it’s not the amount
of money that counts, it’s how effectively you
spend it.
There is thus no point in recovering the Arms
Deal money if it is simply going to be returned
to the same people who misspent it in the first
place. Regardless of how much money becomes
available, ostriches won’t fly, apples won’t
fall upwards, and governments without the right
qualifications and attitude won’t ever be able
to uplift their citizens.
Ron McGregor
Cape Town
With acknowledgement to Noseweek.
If it were possible, returning the equipment to
the governments of the suppliers for a refund
plus interest, would be very good.
Then the Treasury could allocate the necessary
back to the DoD which could then purchase the
right equipment with the right acquisition
processes under the beady eyes of the Fourth
Estate and Civic Society.
The DoD could ensure that not only the correct
equipment was purchased , but that there were
allocations for system support including
ammunition, spares, fuel and training our of the
Special Defence Account and not the SANDF
service annual running budgets.
So it's actually not so futile.
But is it possible?
But other than the money, the crooked natural
and corporate personae, especially the latter,
should be sanctioned as severely as the laws
allow: natural persons get a minimum of 15 years
in the slammer with a daily ration of
hypertension medication while juristic persons
get blacklisted from any government contracts
for a minimum of 20 years, plus a report to the
OECD.
Quiz This Week
Why should juristic persons in general
receive a longer sanction than natural persons?
Clearly the list of worthy donation recipients
is too short to attract much interest in these
competitions, so this week I'll add the Agulhas
Clapper Lark and the Denham's Bustard, worthy
recipients indeed in my view.